Research Misconduct
Overview
It is the policy of UNC Charlotte that the research and creative activities of its faculty, postdoctoral fellows, staff and students be carried out with the highest standards of integrity and ethical behavior. Responsible conduct of research (RCR) includes attributing appropriate credit for work that is not your own, practicing accurate and unbiased data collection, and accurately and honestly reporting research results. UNC Charlotte considers research misconduct, as defined below, to be a betrayal of the fundamental principles of scholarship, and the University will deal promptly with all such allegations.
Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism in proposing, performing, or reviewing research, or in reporting research results. Research misconduct does not include honest error or differences of opinion.
- Fabrication – making up data or results and reporting or recording them in the research record.
- Falsification – manipulating research materials, equipment, or processes, or changing or omitting data or results such that the research is not accurately represented in the research record.
- Plagiarism – the appropriation of another person’s ideas, processes, results, or words without giving appropriate credit.
Federal and Institutional Requirements
In fulfillment of the Federal Research Misconduct Policy, federal agencies that support intramural or extramural research (e.g., PHS, NSF, DOD, DOE, etc.) have published their own policies or regulations to address research integrity and misconduct. Reporting requirements, time limits, and other conditions may differ depending on the funding source for a research project. However, note that UP 309: Research Misconduct Policy and the associated procedures apply to all individuals engaged in research at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, regardless of whether funding is involved. The University’s procedures provide a uniform framework for conducting inquiries and investigations into research misconduct allegations while ensuring full compliance with all appropriate federal regulations.
Any questions about research misconduct may be directed to the Research Integrity Officer (RIO), Dr. Angelica Martins (704-687-1876 / A.Martins@charlotte.edu).
Reporting Research Misconduct
If you suspect research misconduct, you are encouraged to report it:
- Contact the RIO – E-mail: A.Martins@charlotte.edu or Phone: 704-687-1876
- Submit an anonymous report using Ethics Point. Please choose the option “Make a Report” then select “Research Misconduct” OR Dial toll-free within the United States, Guam, Puerto Rico, and Canada: 844-251-1873
UNC Charlotte’s research misconduct procedures are designed to protect the rights of complainants and respondents. Regardless of whether the University determines that misconduct occurred, the RIO will undertake reasonable efforts to protect complainants who make good-faith allegations of research misconduct and others who cooperate in good faith with the evaluation of such allegations. The RIO will also take appropriate steps during the inquiry and investigation to prevent retaliation against the complainant in accordance with the provisions of University Policy 803, Reporting and Investigation of Suspected Improper Activities and Whistleblower Protection.
Institutional Response to Allegations of Research Misconduct
Who Responds to Allegations of Research Misconduct?
The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) is the official responsible for addressing all allegations of research misconduct at the University. The RIO oversees the research misconduct process, and takes reasonable steps to ensure the fair treatment of case participants and maintain–to the greatest possible extent–the confidentiality of case details.
Dr. Angelica Martins (704-687-1876 / A.Martins@charlotte.edu) serves as the RIO for UNC Charlotte.
What Happens After an Allegation of Research Misconduct?
In compliance with federal regulations and as detailed in Research Misconduct Procedures, Supplemental to University Policy 309, allegations of research misconduct are evaluated according to a standardized process:
To learn more about how allegations of research misconduct are handled at UNC Charlotte, please review University Policy 309 and the associated procedures. Any questions may be directed to the Research Integrity Officer (RIO), Dr. Angelica Martins (704-687-1876 / A.Martins@charlotte.edu).
Learn More
Research Misconduct Policies
- UNC Charlotte: University Policy 309 Responding to Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Scholarship
- Public Health Service (PHS), Department of Health and Human Services: 42 CFR Part 93
- National Science Foundation (NSF): 45 CFR Part 689
- United States Department of Agriculture (USDA): 2 CFR Part 422
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): 14 CFR Part 1275
HHS Office of Research Integrity (ORI) Resources
- Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research
- RCR Resources
- Guide to Ethical Writing
- Integrity in Scientific Research Videos
- Interactive Videos:
- Case Studies:
- Misconduct Case Summaries
National Institutes of Health (NIH) Resources
- Research Integrity
- Research Integrity Video: A Case Study on Addressing Research Misconduct
- Responsible Conduct of Research Training
National Science Foundation (NSF) Resources
National Academies Resources